2021.2.4

SVĚT LITERATURY 2021 (XXXI) 64

K poznámke pod čiarou: Bachtinov termín „chronotop“ v kontexte materializmu

REGARDING A FOOTNOTE: BAKHTIN’S TERM “CHRONOTOPE” IN THE CONTEXT OF MATERIALISM

Maxim Duleba

 

 FULL TEXT   

 ABSTRACT (en)

This article contributes to the scholarly discourse on Mikhail Bakhtin’s ambiguous concept of “chronotope” (time-space). As Bakhtin “explains” his understanding of “time” and “space” in Forms of Time and Chronotope in the Novel in the footnote alluding to Kant’s “Transcendental Aesthetics”, claiming to understand “time” and “space” not as “transcendental” but as the forms of the “most immediate reality”, various commentators have focused on the Bakhtin-Kant connection to grasp the term’s conceptual meaning. Responding to the previous scholarly discourse, which has not taken into the consideration the materialist dimension of Bakhtin’s thought, the study reconstructs Bakhtin’s axiology present in his analysis of particular chronotopes and subsequently illustrates chronotope as a materialist anti-ideological tool.

 KEYWORDS (en)

Mikhail Bakhtin — chronotope — dialogism — materialism

 KLÍČOVÁ SLOVA (sk)

Michail Bachtin — chronotop — dialogizmus — materializmus

 DOI

https://doi.org/10.14712/23366729.2021.2.4

 REFERENCES

Ameriks, Karl. Kant’s Theory of Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.

Bachtin, Michail. Román jako dialog. Přel. Daniela Hodrová. Praha: Odeon, 1980.

Bakhtin, Michail. Toward a Philosophy of the Act. Transl. Vadim Liapunov. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1993.

Bakhtin, Michail. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Transl. Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.

Biemong, Nele — Borghart, Pieter. „Bakhtin’s Theory of the Literary Chronotope: Reflections, Applications, Perspectives“. In Bakhtin’s Theory of the Literary Chronotope: Reflections, Applications, Perspectives. Eds. Nele Bemong — Pieter Borghart. Gent: Academia Press, 2010, s. 3–16.

Gardiner, Michael — Bell, Michael. „Bakhtin and the Human Sciences: A Brief Introduction.“ In Bakhtin and the Human Sciences: No Last Words. Eds. Michael Mayerfeld Bell — Michael Gardiner. London: Sage Publications, 1998, s. 1–12.

Holquist, Michael. „The Role of Chronotope in Dialog.“ In Perspectives and Limits of Dialogism in Mikhail Bakhtin. Eds. Karin Junefelt — Pia Nordin, Stockholm: Stockholm University, 2009, s. 9–17.

Kant, Immanuel. Kritika čistého rozumu. Přel. Jaromír Loužil. Praha: Oikoymenh, 2001.

Karačenceva, Tatjana Stanislavovna. „Chronotop i dve estetiky Kanta: Komentarij k odnomu primečaniju.“ Vestnik TjumGU: GI, 2, 2015, č. 2, s. 100–107.

Ladin, Joy. „Fleshing Out the Chronotope.“ In Critical Essays on Mikhail Bakhtin. Ed. Caryl Emerson. New York: Hall, 1999, s. 212–236.

Scholz, Bernhard. „Bakhtin’s Concept of ‘Chronotope’: The Kantian Connection“. In The Contexts of Bakhtin: Philosophy, Authorship, Aesthetics. Ed. David Shepherd. London: Routledge, 1998, s. 141–172.

Tihanov, Galin. The Master and the Slave: Lukács, Bakhtin, and the Ideas of Their Time. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.

Watkins, Eric. „Kant on Materialism.“ British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 24, 2016, č. 5, s. 1035–1052.

Úvod > 2021.2.4