See current and past issues in our e-shop
Enter e-shop
WHY DOES THE STONE NOT OFFER PROTECTION IN FINLAND? STONE AND TREE IN THE FINNISH LEGEND OF ST. HENRY OF UPPSALA
ABSTRACT (en)
In the versions of the Finnish vernacular Ballad of the Death of Bishop Henry (Piispa Henrikin surmavirsi), there are several unclear parts. The part consisting of the Bishop’s instructions for his coachman where to hide and from which place to observe his death is one of them. In one of the versions, the Bishop first mentions a stone as a hiding place, however, immediately realizes its unsuitability. Thereafter he suggests an oak tree (along with a horse in one of the versions). In diverse versions, there is also a dichotomy between listening and watching. The verse kun ei kilpiä kivessä (‘there is no shield in the stone’) is clearly an etymologizing adaptation of the folklore verse kirves kilpesty kivehen / kivestä (the axe rebounded from the stone / slid off the stone) from the epic cycle on Väinämöinen. Putting a stone in contrast with a tree, and transplanting a folklore verse about a stone as an agent of a serious injury into the context of a shield has a symbolic motivation: the medieval Christian symbolism operating with the axiological scale between the inanimate (the stone) and animate (the tree, the horse) matter, and the Christianized part of the Finnish folklore attributing the mere hearing/listening to the devil (Hiisi etc.) and the seeing/watching to God. Thus, the Bishop’s instructions might be comprehended in three ways, all of them interconnected with concern for the hagiographic testimony: as an effort for the sake of the witness’ survival, as an effort to find the proper place for observation of the sacrifice, and finally as an effort to maintain the proper axiological position to pass on the testimony.
KEYWORDS (en)
The Ballad of the Death of Bishop Henry — Finnish folklore adaptations — medieval symbolism — hagiography — stone-tree dichotomy — testimony of martyrdom
KLÍČOVÁ SLOVA (cs)
Píseň o smrti biskupa Jindřicha — adaptace finského folkloru — středověký symbolismus — hagiografie — dichotomie kamene a stromu — svědectví mučednické smrti
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14712/23366729.2023.2.4
REFERENCES
Bogatyrev, Petr. „Folklór jako zvláštní forma tvorby.“ In týž. Souvislosti tvorby: Cesty k struktuře lidové kultury a divadla. Přel. Jaroslav Kolár. Praha: Odeon, 1971, s. 36–47.
Čermák, Jan. Kalevala Eliase Lönnrota a Josefa Holečka v moderní kritické perspektivě. Praha: Academia, 2014.
Heikkilä, Tuomas. Pyhän Henrikin legenda. Helsinki: Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden seura, 2006. Lönnrot, Elias. Kanteletar taikka Suomen kansan wanhoja lauluja ja wirsiä. 3. kirja. Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seuran toimituksia 3. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura, 1840
Lönnrot, Elias. „Pispa Henrikin surmavirsi“. Suomi: Tidskrift i fosterländska ämnen, 1856, s. 43–56.
Pastoureau, Michel. Dějiny symbolů v kultuře středověkého západu. Přel. Helena Beguivinová. Praha: Argo, 2018.
SKVR — Suomen kansan vanhat runot. [online]. [cit. 12. 5. 2023]. Dostupné z https://skvr.fi/.
Vento, Urpo (ed.). Piispa Henrikin surmavirsi — Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden seuran kansanrunousarkiston vanhin käsikirjoitus: The Oldest Manuscript in the Folklore Archives of the Finnish Literature Society — The Ballad of the Death of Bishop Henry. Helsinki: Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden seura, 1999.
Meier-Staubach, Christel. Gemma Spiritalis: Methode und Gebrauch der Edelsteinallegorese vom frühen Christentum bis ins 18. Jahrhundert. München: Fink, 1977.
Pentcheva, Bissera. The Sensual Icon: Space, Ritual, and the Senses in Byzantium. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2010.
Pichaničová, Veronika. Precious Stones in Religious Objects: Use and Representation in the Early Medieval Latin West. Roma: Viella, 2023.
Pichaničová, Veronika. „Světlo v době temna: zlato a drahé kameny ve službách křesťanské víry.“ In Je (raný středověk) doba temna? Eds. Ivan Foletti — Sabina Rosenbergová — Martin Lešák — Veronika Pichaničová. Brno: Books & Pipes — Masarykova univerzita 2021, s. 105–128.
Plinius, Gaius Secundus. História prírody. Prel. Eleonora Vallová. Ed. Michal Habaj. Bratislava: Perfekt, 2021.
Pliny The Elder. The Natural History. 10 sv. Transl. Harris Rackham — William Henry Samuel Jones — David Edward Eichholz. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1938–1962.
Pliny the Elder. The Natural History. Eds. and transl. John Bostock — Henry T. Riley. London: Taylor and Francis, 1855. [online]. [cit. 12. 5. 2023]. Dostupné z https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Plin.+Nat.+toc.
Prochno, Renate. Die Stephansburse: Die Sprache der Steine. Regensburg: Schnell & Steiner, 2012.
Rabanus Maurus. De Universo. Patrologiae Cursus Completus/Patrologia Latina 111. Ed. Jacques Paul Migne. Paris: Migne (u.a.), 1864.
Smout, Caroline. „Prachteinband zum Evangeliar (Codex Aureus) — BSB Clm 14000#Einband“. Prachteinbände. Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, 2017. [online]. [cit. 16.6.2021]. Dostupné z https://einbaende.digitale-sammlungen.de/Prachteinbaende/Clm_14000_Einband_Hauptaufnahme.
Šedinová, Hana. Drahokamy Svatováclavské kaple. Praha: Petr Rezek, 2005.
Šedinová, Hana. „Kameny.“ In Jan Royt — Hana Šedinová. Slovník symbolů: Kosmos, příroda a člověk v křesťanské ikonografii. Praha: Mladá fronta, 1998, s. 26–78.
Šedinová, Hana. „The Precious Stones of Heavenly Jerusalem in the Medieval Book Illustration and their Comparison with the Wall Incrustation in St. Wenceslas Chapel“. Artibus et historiae, 41, 2000, č. 21, s. 31–47.
The Lives of the Eighth-Century Popes (Liber Pontificalis): The Ancient Biographies of Nine Popes from AD 715 to AD 817. Ed. and transl. Raymond Davis. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1992.
The Lives of the Ninth-Century Popes (Liber Pontificalis): The Ancient Biographies of Ten Popes from A.D. 817–891. Ed. and transl. Raymond Davis. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1995.
Werckmeister, Otto Karl. Der Deckel des Codex Aureus von St. Emmeram, ein Goldschmiedewerk des 9. Jahrhunderts. Baden-Baden: Heitz, 1963.
